Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Happy New YearHappy 2008!

It’s been several days (22, to be exact) since I posted, and several weeks since I’ve posted regularly. In fact, right about the time that Chris had his public “i hate stupid pr people” meltdown, I basically stopped blogging. I’m not sure why, but all of a sudden the blogosphere felt like a Mean Girls sequel and I didn’t want to participate.

So I stopped. But I didn’t go away — I caught up on several books I wanted to read, I found several lesser known blogs that I now follow, and for once, I started watching my traffic. I mean really paying attention to your every click on First Person PR. I learned a lot about you, my readers, as well as about myself and where I want to take my blog. Now, please allow me to join every other blogger to share some lessons learned and how those lessons formed my blogging resolutions for 2008:

  1. My traffic and subsequent new RSS subscribers grew more after I stopped posting. At first, this was bothersome. But then I noticed that a very small subset of my posts were getting all the new traffic. Ah yes, my friends, I found out there really is a long tail! Want to know what the common theme was on those top traffic getting posts? If you guess social media, you’re wrong. Instead, my five most original post topics (i.e. – those not building on an existing blog thread/conversation already taking place) delivered more new readers than all the other posts combined. With that, 2008 blogging resolution #1 is to focus my posts on unique topics.
  2. I also started paying attention to the linking habits of my existing subscribers (I admit: all this tracking felt a little Big Brother-ish). Not surprisingly, any post relating first-hand experience compelled many of you to jump out of your feed reader and onto my blog. I’m honestly not sure there’s value in having you actually click onto the site if you’re a faithful reader, but those same post topics directly correlate to the most popular search terms sending traffic my way. Could that be word of mouth marketing at play? My key take away here is that you’re most interested in hearing what works and what doesn’t, and how the agency and corporate PR worlds differ. Which means 2008 blogging resolution #2 is to share my first person experiences (get it? I’m being clever…).
  3. During my self-invoke hiatus, I spent more time talking with fellow bloggers. I mean really talking — at events and via email. The conversations were both interesting and educational (fortunately, I took notes for future posts because many of these discussions address my first resolution). Those conversations reminded me how important networking still is. I think many bloggers fall into a trap of cross-linking without ever actually interacting. Could some of these conversations taken place in the comments section of our blogs? Probably. But I think the end result was more valuable to me. So 2008 blogging resolution #3 is to remember to that the best networking requires an actual connection be made.
  4. And finally, 2008 blogging resolution #4 is to comment more on other blogs. True, this isn’t based on a lesson, and it doesn’t help resolution #3. But, I enjoy reading your comments so I need to pass that on.

Since my resolutions are meant to improve my blog, if there’s something you’d like to see more (or less) of, please let me know!

Last week, I attended the SNRC’s Annual Research Symposium in Boston. It was an interesting day, with the majority of the agenda focused on communications professionals presenting real world case studies (refreshing).

I was planning to digest the content and then write a few smart posts, but figured I’d share what I took away from the event (my notes might jump a bit).

Panel: New Media, New Influencers & Implications for the PR Profession

This panel had several prominent bloggers – including Paul Gillin and John Cass – presenting case studies from companies they’ve interviewed in the last year about corporate blogging.

Pulling from their examples and the discussion, here’s the list of what seemed to work well for corporate and CEO blogs:

  • Allow the blog to reflect the company’s/CEO’s personality
  • Focus on building an audience by mixing thought leadership topics with more personal topics (not updates on your children, but rather iTune playlists, the Red Sox vs. Yankees, etc.)
  • Interview other industry experts – even competitors if it’s relevant
  • Feature an ongoing quiz or survey to maintain traffic
  • Update three times a week to improve SEO
  • Comment on OTHER blogs to truly engage the audience
  • And finally, measure success across several dynamics (traffic, comments, etc.)

That said, in order to measure success, you need to have an early consensus on the blog’s goal. Then, make sure you’re measuring the relevant factors. For example:

  • If the goal is career advancement, measure levels of recognition
  • If the goal is to build a community, track the level of engagement with comments, guest posts and feedback sections
  • If the goal is to drive sales, track leads and $$$
  • If the goal is thought leadership, track the increase in press interviews, speaking invitations, etc.

Presentation: The Blogging Power Continuum (Joseph Carrabis)

This presentation fascinated me because it was based on a project that took super smart brain scientists (my terminology for them), threw in some quantum physics (or something equally technical) and then applied that science to analyze a subset of the blogosphere. In all seriousness, Joseph talked about a research project he’s conducting that takes a very scientific approach to measuring conversation across multiple aspects in the blogosphere (he even claims that they called the last presidential election). As an experiment, his team looked at the current presidential candidates’ blogs, including comment strings, and then mapped which ones were driving conversations and which ones were following conversations.

Out of that research, Joseph shared the following advice (some we already knew – but now it’s backed by fact):

  • What is power about in the blogosphere? Respect.
  • The most flexible communicators have the most “power” in the blogosphere because they can explain ideas to the masses and therefore have broader reach.
  • How do you gain power in the blogosphere? You gamble:
    • Give credit where it is due
    • Admit your mistakes
    • Manage your discussion (think of your audience as clients)
    • Be honest
    • Lead the discussion
    • Explain everything
  • How do you share power (and you must share power to maintain it … “give a little to keep a lot”)
    • Recognize other’s authority and experience
    • Accept chastisement graciously
    • Never argue (not to be confused with discussion. As Joseph said, “Inquiry, discussion and explanation come from differences.”)
    • Be willing to learn
    • Encourage the discussion
    • Never cover

Panels: Award Winning Case Studies

Several panelists shared case studies of social media in action, including a first hand account of the Coke/Mentos video. A lot of this was consumer-focused and interesting, but one comment really caught my attention (I don’t remember who said it): “Embracing social media and traditional outreach together creates a ‘PR Loop Effect’ that ultimately compounds the effect/result.”

Presentation: Social Media Global Trends

Shel Israel gave the closing presentation which shared highlights from a global survey on social media he conducted with SAP. It was a great presentation and he posted the report in a few sections on his blog, which is definitely worth the read. Below are the seven lessons Shel shared with us.

  1. Social media is kids’ stuff
  2. Social networks is the killer app
  3. Culture matters. Language matters.
  4. Measurement is improving, but it’s still unclear what to measure.
  5. The geek-to-suit gap is shortening. Kids overtaking geeks.
  6. Lose control to gain influence.
  7. The world is not yet flat, but it is getting hillier.

Shel’s closed the presentation by sharing his thoughts on the study and his predictions. The most notable for me was his advice to “watch the kids – they’ll lead you in the right direction.”

The folks over at The Bad Pitch Blog issued a call for the top things PR people should never say to reporters. People got creative in the comments and on Facebook, and Kevin and Richard posted a PDF with their top 10 picks. Yours truly even made the list with my suggestions (and got a little AdAge fame):

  • Sorry, we’re only briefing top tier media on this news.
  • We’ll give you a local exclusive on this. The WSJ is doing a piece, but we don’t view you as competitive.
  • Since you didn’t cover us after our last meeting, you really owe us a story.
  • I saw an interesting piece on CNET and thought you’d be interested in doing a similar story.
  • No executive is available to talk about this. But it’s big news, trust me.

Check it out and make sure you add the blog to your RSS feed (seriously, it’s one of my favorite blogs — some of the pitches they post are like watching a face lift on TLC. I cringe, but I’m horrified and entertained at the same time).

And make sure you let us know if you have more suggestions to add … maybe it’ll turn into a top 50 list soon!

As follow on to my last post, here’s a great blog entry by Rohit Bhargava called, “7 Lessons On How To Be a Great Client.” It provides great advice for clients looking to build lasting relationships with PR/marketing/communications agencies.

Read Rohit’s piece for more details, but his seven key pieces of advice are:

  1. Provide clear direction
  2. Invite us to the table early
  3. Be honest about success factors
  4. Take the advice you are paying for
  5. Know what you don’t know
  6. Understand that changes affect timelines
  7. Ask our advice

Have any others you’d like to add?

1. Don’t be a jackass. You laugh, but I’ll wager that every agency person has worked with an abusive client at one point. Maybe it’s a VP of marketing who used to have a $15 million budget and ran PR for a F100 company who doesn’t understand why their $50k annual budget doesn’t get the same jumping-at-the-sound-of-their-voice reaction. Or maybe it’s a new CMO that thinks business reporters should jump at the chance to cover a startup with no customers, no shipping product, no real strategy, and no known investors. Or, perhaps that day-to-day contact is just over whelmed and can’t do everything being asked of her.Regardless of the reasons why, there’s never an excuse to be an ass to your team. I promise, yelling doesn’t make them work harder and won’t make them respect you. And going over the manager’s head every other day doesn’t build a strong relationship.

This doesn’t mean that you can’t or shouldn’t expect a lot from your team. My top three favorite clients are also the most demanding clients I ever worked for. They respected me and I respected them … I’d go out of my way to help them and my team made sure they looked good internally.

2. Your 18 I-know-this-isn’t-PR-related-but-can-you-deal-with-it-anyway requests ate the budget. Especially with startups, agencies are often asked to fill in on projects, write webinar media alerts, track down reprint costs, etc. when the internal staff is overworked or non-existent. Unless you’re in a super hot company in a very popular industry, not focusing on media relations will always result in less coverage. Asking a team to jump on these minor tasks is understandable (if temporary), but if this is your situation, you need to accept there will tradeoffs and these “easy” projects can tend to be time consuming. If your priority is coverage and results, make sure you’re not the agency’s biggest obstacle.

3. That’s a dumb idea. I’m sorry, but sometimes it just is.

4. You’re not the only client. And 10 p.m. isn’t business hours. Oh, and my private cell phone … is private (okay, that might be three things). Think that contradicts client service? I don’t. I believe if a client/agency relationship is mutually respectful, the client needs to understand that parameters exist. I think I was a rare bird in the agency because I actually told my clients that one, I turned my cell phone off as soon as I entered the office building (my mom didn’t like that rule either); two, I couldn’t promise I’d answer a call or email in the evening unless I was expecting it; and three, if I didn’t pick up a page, I was probably on the phone with another client. Having a client email me, IM me, call my cell and call my office all in a matter of 30 seconds was too much for me, and ended up distracting me and creating an unnecessary level of anxiety. So at one point, I finally stopped it. I was always diplomatic in how I explained it to my clients, but I was honest and upfront about where my work/personal boundaries were.

I get that the core of agency service is client service. But unless you’re Microsoft, your agency most likely has more than one client. Especially when you’re working on more than one client, and with all the distractions that technology provides, agency people need to be able to focus when they can. That’s why your agency provides a team … if one person is unreachable, chances are you’ll find someone else (And I guarantee if your panic attack is related to a syringe being found in your product, even the most junior person on the team will know enough to find a senior person pronto).

Side note to all you agency readers and minor rant coming: To me, there is nothing more annoying and disrespectful than scheduling a team meeting only to make the junior staff wait while you talk on your cell phone, thinking your time is more valuable than theirs. Likewise, your clients are people, too, and if you work with them to meet all the deadlines during the day (which means sending that release at 4, not 8), then there’s no need for evening calls. You’ll never convince me it’s necessary for a client to call you at 9 p.m. to talk about a pitch going out two weeks later, or for you to call your client on Friday night to talk about an award due the following Wednesday. If I send my agency an email at 10 at night, it’s because I’m catching up. I don’t expect a reply until the next day :)

5. All that coverage doesn’t just happen. There always comes a point when a client starts thinking they’re all that, makes an agency switch for some random reason (less money, they can do more for less, etc.), and then the coverage disappears. I actually had a client that we took from 60 pieces of coverage to 500 and then almost 1,000 in two years (and they were high quality, on message) … then hubris kicked in, they made a switch, and went down to about 12 pieces of coverage the following six months. Yes, it happens that quickly. No, reporters don’t just “call” PR people to talk to you. When you start thinking that securing those massive amounts of coverage is like shooting fish in a barrel, it’s time for a reality check. It has more to do with your PR team kicking ass and maintaining key relationships than you think.

Wow. I feel better now … some of those have been bottled up for a few years.

This week’s ad:tech was insane … my feet are still sore. Unfortunately, I didn’t get to sit in on a lot of sessions, but I did hit a few and got some great nuggets that relate to PR/communications:

  • I think I might want to (eventually) work for a consumer company. With lots of money. Several All of the coolest social media case studies I heard came from consumer companies.
  • The “holy grail” of social media — whether it be social networks, blogs, video, etc. — is to move from B2B marketing/communications to C2C communications, where your brand advocates are carrying the message. This theme popped up a few times, and one attendee commented that using the “C2C” description to his execs resonated more quickly than social media did (who doesn’t love a good acronym, right?).
  • One panelist from Fox Interactive Media talked about the “momentum effect” of social media. Here are two articles talking about the study back in April. They’re geared toward consumers and advertising, but it includes some great stats that could be helpful selling social media internally.
  • Content continues to be king. But in the world of social media and consumer generated content (read: content overload) it needs to be more than simply relevant and interesting — it needs to add value to the community.
  • Authenticity, authenticity, authenticity.
  • And finally, don’t engage a community and then abandon them (I feel like I’ve broken this rule lately).

And now, I’m off to soak the feet :)

It’s been an insane month (and seriously, is it really November already)? I’ll be back on board with new posts soon.

In the meantime, I’m heading to NYC next Sunday through Wednesday for ad:tech. Would love to meet with anyone who’s going … drop me a line at kari [underscore] hanson2003 [at] yahoo

Everyone’s focused on the Facebook/Microsoft investment news. It’s been a topic in the rumor mill for several weeks, so it’s really not that shocking anymore. I’ve been watching the rumors and the news closely, though, because on the PR front, we all knew that at some point before the official announcement, the rumor would be inadvertently confirmed (it always happens with news that big). The questions we were all asking were when and how.

A few news sites confirmed the rumor with “un-named” sources, but did anyone see ValleyWag’s confirmation post? They happened to notice that key PR contacts at both companies had friended each other on Facebook. Clearly, ValleyWag made a (not so) huge leap of faith, but as we embrace more social technologies, this is something for us all to keep in mind: the scoop oriented media (read: bloggers) may be watching the company you keep.

Rohit Bhargava recently posted a presentation he gave about marketing in a Web 2.0 world that got me to thinking about transparency and authenticity.Let’s face it – transparency is one of the most used social media buzzwords (perhaps not too far behind conversation, blogosphere and, well, social media). It’s also a word that is both easily defined yet hard to grasp. I find this especially true when we talk about companies becoming more transparent in their communications, particularly when trying to balance the needs of the company with the requests of the online world.

Rohit’s presentation resonated with me because I agree – it’s not necessarily about transparency in communications, it’s about authenticity – in everything you we do.

If you accept that businesses are around to make money, you must also accept that there will, necessarily, be limitations on how open a company can/should be. That means that sometimes, this “transparency” isn’t always the right choice for companies – particularly when discussing future plans of the company.

However, I believe it is very possible for executives to be authentic while still maintaining a competitive edge and protecting proprietary information. In the end, it’s all about adding a lot more “human factor” and removing the corporate speak — which ultimately helps build trusting relationships with employees, shareholders, customers and partners, and even the media. All this is done by simply allowing a spokesperson to be honest and forthcoming (without disclosing company secrets).

A post I wrote a few months ago, Corporate vs. Agency: An Inside Out View continues to be one of the top posts on First Person PR. Based on the comments and emails related to that post, it’s clearly a topic many of you are interested in, so I thought I’d revisit it.

I have a second post ready with even more similarities and differences between the two PR camps. But before I publish it, I wanted to issue a call for contributions so I can your observations to it. So, for those of you who started on one side and move to the other, I’d love to your thoughts on the main differences (and similarities) you’ve found between the two.

Either leave your submission as a comment to this post, or email it to me at kari [underscore] hanson2003 [at] yahoo [dot] com, and I’ll merge them into a single list.

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »